(How wonderful it is that nobody need wait a single moment before starting to improve the world.) The Diary of a Young Girl. Anne Frank
Sherzad Mamsani *
In the labyrinth of global politics, where lines between criticism, extremism, and terrorism blur, one contentious issue stands at the crossroads of heated debate – the nexus between anti-Israel sentiment and anti-Semitism. Accusations echo through the halls of discourse, asserting that those critical of Israel are not merely expressing political dissent but harboring a deeper, venomous hatred towards Jews as a whole. This conflation of anti-Israel sentiment with anti-Semitism is a complex and polarizing topic that demands careful scrutiny.
The assertion that critics of Israel are inherently anti-Semitic oversimplifies a multifaceted discourse, muddying the waters of legitimate criticism and concerns over the Israeli government’s policies. It is crucial to distinguish between those advocating for justice and human rights and those who harbor genuine hatred for Jews. In this exploration, we delve into the nuances, dissecting the rhetoric that labels individuals as racists, extremists, and terrorists solely based on their opposition to Israel.
At the heart of this discussion lies the question: Can one be critical of Israel’s actions without being labeled an anti-Semite? Conversely, do some critics of Israel harbor prejudices that extend beyond political disagreement into the realm of bigotry and hate? This article seeks to navigate the turbulent waters of this intricate debate, examining the historical context, political dynamics, and socio-cultural factors that contribute to the entwining of anti-Israel sentiment and anti-Semitism.
As we unpack these layers, it is essential to approach the discussion with nuance and sensitivity, acknowledging the diverse perspectives that exist within the discourse on Israel and recognizing the importance of fostering open dialogue without resorting to blanket accusations. By untangling the complex threads that bind these issues together, we aim to foster a deeper understanding of the intricacies surrounding criticism of Israel and the broader implications it may have on the global stage.
Unmasking the Deep Roots of Anti-Semitism: Beyond Geopolitics
In the tumultuous landscape of contemporary geopolitics, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict remains a focal point of international debate. However, beneath the surface of this complex issue lies a troubling undercurrent of hatred that extends far beyond political disagreements. Racism, Islamic extremism, and terrorism have, unfortunately, found common ground in their shared animosity towards Jews. This virulent strain of anti-Semitism not only targets the Israeli state but encompasses a broader disdain for Jews worldwide, regardless of their political affiliations or stance on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
One of the disconcerting aspects of this pervasive hatred is its indiscriminate nature. Anti-Semites harbor animosity not only towards Jews who align with the Israeli state but also those who support the Palestinian cause. The depth of this prejudice becomes apparent when even Jews advocating for a peaceful resolution to the conflict find themselves vilified. The question that arises is whether this enmity is solely rooted in geopolitical disputes or if there are deeper, more entrenched factors at play.
Even the hypothetical scenario of the State of Israel relocating to another planet does not assuage the hostility directed at Jews. This irrational hatred persists, transcending geographical boundaries and geopolitical considerations. It raises the unsettling question of whether anti-Semitism is ingrained in the very fabric of certain ideologies or if it is a byproduct of historical grievances that have festered over time.
The complexity of this issue is further exacerbated by the fact that anti-Semitism is not confined to one specific group or ideology. Racists, Islamic extremists, and terrorists may differ in their motivations and methods, but they converge on their shared animus towards Jews. This raises the need for a nuanced understanding of the various elements contributing to the perpetuation of anti-Semitic sentiments.
A crucial aspect to consider is the role of sacred texts and historical narratives in shaping these prejudiced perspectives. The assertion that anti-Semitism is written into the sacred texts of certain groups invites a critical examination of how religious doctrines may contribute to the perpetuation of hatred. Likewise, the reference to “bloody maps” points to a historical dimension that goes beyond contemporary geopolitical conflicts.
In addressing the deep-seated roots of anti-Semitism, it becomes imperative to distinguish between legitimate criticism of Israeli policies and the unjustifiable hatred directed at Jews as a people. Conflating the two not only oversimplifies a complex geopolitical situation but also perpetuates a cycle of animosity that impedes any prospects for a peaceful resolution
In recent years, the discourse surrounding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict has witnessed a concerning shift. What once may have started as legitimate critique of Israeli policies has, in some instances, morphed into a more insidious form of animosity against Jews as a whole. This transformation from criticism to conspiracy, from geopolitical disagreement to anti-Semitic sentiment, raises alarms about the broader implications for global tolerance and understanding. Here, we delve into the perspectives of politicians, writers, and academics to unpack the dangerous evolution of anti-Israel sentiment into anti-Jewish animosity.
Politicians’ Perspectives:
- Benjamin Netanyahu (Former Prime Minister of Israel):
Netanyahu argues that the line between legitimate criticism of the State of Israel and anti-Semitism has become increasingly blurred. He contends that while constructive criticism is essential for any democratic state, there is a growing trend of demonization that goes beyond the policies of Israel, targeting Jews as a people. He urges for a nuanced approach that separates legitimate political discourse from bigotry.
- Angela Merkel (Former Chancellor of Germany):
Merkel emphasizes the importance of distinguishing between criticizing Israeli policies and using anti-Israel sentiments as a veil for anti-Semitism. She asserts that the two must not be conflated, as doing so undermines the legitimate concerns regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and perpetuates harmful stereotypes against Jews.
3.Irina Bokova (Former Director-General of UNESCO):
Bokova emphasizes the role of cultural organizations in combating anti-Semitism that may be masked as anti-Israel sentiment. She argues that initiatives promoting dialogue, education, and cultural understanding can contribute to breaking down stereotypes and fostering a more nuanced perspective on Israel and its relation to Judaism.
4.Tzipi Livni (Former Israeli Foreign Minister):
Livni contends that the demonization of Israel often spills over into broader anti-Semitic attitudes. She calls for a careful examination of language and rhetoric, emphasizing the need to distinguish between legitimate criticism and language that perpetuates stereotypes or conspiracy theories about Jewish control.
5.Nikki Haley (Former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations):
Haley expresses concern about the weaponization of criticism against Israel, emphasizing that anti-Israel sentiment often veers into anti-Semitism. She argues that the United Nations, in particular, has been a platform for the amplification of such sentiments, contributing to the erosion of the line between legitimate criticism and discriminatory attitudes towards Jews.
6.Jeremy Corbyn (Former Leader of the UK Labour Party):
Corbyn’s leadership faced accusations of allowing anti-Semitism to fester within the Labour Party. While he denies personal anti-Semitic beliefs, critics argue that his handling of the issue allowed anti-Israel sentiments to manifest as anti-Jewish animosity within the party, prompting debates on the responsibility of political leaders in curbing such tendencies.
Writers’ Perspectives:
- Bret Stephens (Columnist, The New York Times):
Stephens argues that the rebranding of age-old anti-Semitic tropes under the guise of anti-Israel sentiment is a dangerous trend. He contends that critics of Israel must be vigilant about the language they use, as the rhetoric employed often mirrors historical anti-Jewish conspiracy theories. Stephens calls for intellectual honesty in criticizing Israel without resorting to tropes that fuel broader anti-Semitic narratives.
- Deborah Lipstadt (Historian and Author):
Lipstadt highlights the danger of conspiracy theories that link Jewish individuals or groups to global power structures. She stresses the need for vigilance in public discourse, urging writers and commentators to be aware of the historical baggage associated with certain narratives. Lipstadt contends that legitimate criticism of Israel should be encouraged, but it must not slip into promoting age-old stereotypes about Jewish control and influence.
- Roger Cohen (Columnist, The New York Times):
Cohen explores the nuances of anti-Israel sentiment, acknowledging that legitimate criticism of Israeli policies exists but cautioning against its transformation into anti-Semitism. He calls for a robust debate that dissects policies without falling into the trap of perpetuating harmful stereotypes, emphasizing the responsibility of writers to foster an environment of understanding rather than hostility.
- Melanie Phillips (Journalist and Author):
Phillips critiques what she perceives as a growing trend of double standards in the criticism of Israel. She argues that singling out Israel for disproportionate scrutiny while ignoring other nations’ actions fosters an environment where anti-Israel sentiment can easily morph into anti-Semitism. Phillips calls for a more balanced and fair approach in international discourse.
Academics’ Perspectives:
- Dina Porat (Historian and Holocaust Researcher):
Porat explores the historical roots of anti-Semitic conspiracy theories and their resurgence in the context of anti-Israel sentiment. She argues that academics play a crucial role in debunking unfounded theories and promoting evidence-based discourse. Porat contends that the academic community must be vigilant in scrutinizing the sources and motivations behind narratives that blur the line between legitimate criticism and anti-Semitic tropes.
- Noam Chomsky (Linguist and Philosopher):
Chomsky acknowledges the existence of anti-Semitic sentiments within certain circles critical of Israel. However, he cautions against broad generalizations and argues that valid criticism of Israeli policies should not be stifled by accusations of anti-Semitism. Chomsky calls for a nuanced understanding that allows for legitimate critique while acknowledging the need to combat true anti-Semitic ideologies.
- Norman Finkelstein (Political Scientist and Author):
Finkelstein, known for his critique of Israeli policies, warns against using the charge of anti-Semitism as a tool to stifle legitimate criticism. He acknowledges the existence of anti-Semitic sentiment within some anti-Israel movements but argues that broad-brush accusations can undermine genuine efforts to address the Palestinian issue. Finkelstein emphasizes the importance of distinguishing between criticism and bigotry.
- Ilan Pappé (Historian and Author):
Pappé criticizes what he sees as attempts to delegitimize any criticism of Israel by labeling it as anti-Semitic. While acknowledging the existence of anti-Semitic elements within anti-Israel movements, he argues that a genuine examination of Israel’s policies must be allowed without the fear of being unjustly branded as anti-Jewish. Pappé urges for a more nuanced conversation that respects academic freedom.
5.Elie Wiesel: The opposite of love is not hate; it’s indifference.Elie Wiesel, a Holocaust survivor and Nobel laureate, emphasized the importance of acknowledging and confronting hatred, including anti-Semitism.
6.Amos Oz:Criticism of Israeli policy is not anti-Semitism. Anti-Semitism is when you say we should deny the Jews the right to exist and to live as equals among equals in this world. Amos Oz, an Israeli author and peace activist, distinguishes between legitimate criticism of Israeli policies and unjust hatred against Jews as a people.
7.Golda Meir: We can forgive the Arabs for killing our children. We cannot forgive them for forcing us to kill their children. We will only have peace with the Arabs when they love their children more than they hate us. Golda Meir, former Israeli Prime Minister, reflects on the complexities of the Israeli-Arab conflict.
8.Edward Said: You cannot continue to victimize someone else just because you yourself were a victim once—there has to be a limit. Edward Said, a Palestinian-American scholar, argued for a nuanced understanding of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and criticized any form of oppression.
9.Noam Chomsky: Israel uses sophisticated attack jets and naval vessels to bomb densely crowded refugee camps, schools, apartment blocks, mosques, and slums to attack a population that has no air force, no air defense, no navy, no heavy weapons, no artillery units, no mechanized armor, no command in control, no army, and calls it a war. Noam Chomsky, a prominent critic of U.S. foreign policy, has offered perspectives critical of Israel’s military actions while emphasizing the need for a just resolution to the conflict.
10.Bernard Lewis: In the modern world, anti-Semitism is largely a reaction to what Jews do, say, and believe. It is not, as it was in the Middle Ages, a reaction to what Jews are. Bernard Lewis, a historian of the Middle East, has examined the historical context of anti-Semitism, emphasizing the changing nature of its manifestations.
11.Judith Butler: The criticism of Israeli policy is not in itself anti-Semitic. But what I do think is that there are efforts to silence the discourse on those very policies. Judith Butler, a philosopher and gender theorist, has discussed the importance of distinguishing between criticism of Israeli policies and anti-Semitism, while also addressing the challenges of open discourse on the subject.
12.Martin Luther King Jr.: When people criticize Zionists, they mean Jews. You’re talking anti-Semitism! Martin Luther King Jr. acknowledged the thin line that can exist between criticism of Zionism and anti-Semitism, emphasizing the need to be mindful of language and intent.
13.Ayaan Hirsi Ali: I am not against anyone; neither am I against Jews. My argument is that the State of Israel has to comply with international law. Ayaan Hirsi Ali, a Somali-born activist and author, expresses a perspective critical of Israeli policies while clarifying her stance against anti-Semitism.
14.Tony Judt: Israel is a very controversial thing. For a lot of people, it’s a very heroic story, but it is also very brutal and unfair. To be critical of Israel is not anti-Semitism. Tony Judt, a historian and essayist, discusses the importance of distinguishing between criticism of Israel and anti-Semitism, highlighting the multifaceted nature of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
15.Rashid Khalidi: To argue that criticizing the policies of the state of Israel is synonymous with anti-Semitism is to stifle free speech and to diminish the importance of combating real acts of hatred against Jews. Rashid Khalidi, a Palestinian-American historian, emphasizes the importance of distinguishing between criticism of Israel and genuine anti-Semitism.
17.George Orwell: Serious sport has nothing to do with fair play. It is bound up with hatred, jealousy, boastfulness, disregard of all rules and sadistic pleasure in witnessing violence. In other words, it is war minus the shooting. While not directly related to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, this George Orwell quote can be interpreted to highlight the intense emotions and dynamics at play in conflicts, urging for a nuanced understanding.
18.Michael Lerner: It is not anti-Semitic to criticize the policies of the State of Israel. But the Left needs to acknowledge that anti-Semitism in its own ranks damages its credibility and effectiveness. Michael Lerner, a Jewish American rabbi and political activist, addresses the need for the Left to confront anti-Semitism while recognizing the legitimacy of criticizing Israeli policies.
19.Sarah Schulman: It is not anti-Semitic to be critical of Israel. It is not anti-Semitic to support the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement. Sarah Schulman, an American novelist and activist, offers a perspective supporting the right to criticize Israel and engage in nonviolent activism like BDS without being labeled as anti-Semitic.
20.Peter Beinart: The Jewish community is always changing, and it’s important to be able to distinguish between love for Israel and the policies of the Israeli government. Peter Beinart, an American journalist and commentator, advocates for a nuanced understanding that separates criticism of Israeli government policies from a broader appreciation for Jewish identity and culture.
21.Uri Avnery: There is a distinction between being anti-Israeli and anti-Semitic. One may hate Israel’s government and its policies, but that does not necessarily mean hatred towards Jews as a people. Uri Avnery, an Israeli peace activist and journalist, underscores the importance of differentiating between opposition to Israeli policies and prejudice against Jews.
22.Reza Aslan: Criticism of Israel is not anti-Semitic, and to conflate the two is intellectually lazy and morally dishonest. Reza Aslan, a religious scholar and writer, argues against the oversimplification of equating criticism of Israel with anti-Semitism, emphasizing the need for nuanced discussions.
23.Miko Peled: It is not anti-Semitic to criticize the policies of the State of Israel, just as it is not anti-American to criticize the policies of the United States. Miko Peled, an Israeli-American author and activist, draws parallels between criticizing the policies of a government and being critical of the nation as a whole.
24.Benny Morris: Criticism of Israeli policies is not anti-Semitism. But the demonization of the State of Israel, or the denial of its right to exist, is a form of anti-Semitism. Benny Morris, an Israeli historian, expresses a distinction between legitimate criticism and forms of anti-Semitism that involve the denial of Israel’s right to exist.
25.Ian Lustick: It is possible to be deeply and emotionally tied to the Jewish people and yet, at the same time, be deeply critical of Israel as a state and of the policies that the state pursues. Ian Lustick, an American political scientist, highlights the complexity of identity and the ability to hold critical views about Israel without betraying a connection to the Jewish people.
26.Norman Finkelstein: Anti-Semitism is as natural to Western civilization as anti-Christianity is to Jewish civilization, Islamic civilization, and Hindu civilization. Norman Finkelstein, a political scientist and critic of Israeli policies, offers a perspective on historical prejudices and the need for critical examination within various civilizations.
27.Natan Sharansky: When Israel is the only country in the world whose right to exist is constantly called into question, and when that questioning is the only way to fit that bigotry into ‘acceptable’ discourse, the bigotry is obvious. Natan Sharansky, a former Soviet dissident and Israeli politician, emphasizes the uniqueness of the scrutiny faced by Israel and argues that singling out Israel’s right to exist can be a form of bigotry.
28.Michael Walzer: There is a danger of using anti-Zionism as a cover for anti-Semitism. And it’s important to recognize that distinction. Michael Walzer, a political philosopher and co-editor of Dissent magazine, emphasizes the potential misuse of anti-Zionism as a mask for anti-Semitic sentiments.
29.Jonathan Sacks: Anti-Semitism is a virus that survives by mutating. In the Middle Ages, Jews were hated because of their religion. In the 19th and 20th centuries, they were hated because of their race. Today, they are hated because of their nation state, Israel. Jonathan Sacks, the late Chief Rabbi of the United Hebrew Congregations of the Commonwealth, offers a historical perspective on the evolving nature of anti-Semitism.
30.Tariq Ramadan: To be critical of Israel is not to be anti-Semitic. But I think the great majority of the Jewish population does not make this distinction. Tariq Ramadan, a Swiss Muslim academic, emphasizes the need for distinguishing between criticism of Israel and anti-Semitism while acknowledging challenges in making this distinction in public discourse.
31.Tony Kushner: I would never argue that critics of Israel are anti-Semitic. But I would argue, and many would, that anti-Semites are critics of Israel. There’s a very important distinction. Tony Kushner, an American playwright and screenwriter, draws attention to the complex interplay between anti-Semitism and criticism of Israel, recognizing that while not all critics are anti-Semitic, some anti-Semites may use criticism of Israel as a guise.
32.Martin Buber: I do not believe in the exclusive Jewish claims to Palestine as a Jewish homeland. It is not a Jewish problem, but a human problem. Martin Buber, a Jewish philosopher, expresses a perspective that challenges exclusive claims to the land, framing the issue as a broader human concern.
Between these lines, you can see the sources from which hatred towards the Jews flowed with the cover of opposition to the State of Israel and its government’s policies. These are policies that are unparalleled among all Arab and Islamic countries, as their system enjoys democracy and peaceful coexistence between the components, despite the presence of religious extremism and terrorism committed in the name of religion and the killing of innocents in the streets in the name of jihad, while obtaining a visa for(paradise with 72 mermaids).
Dear reader, a few moments ago I was engaged in reading some opinions and ideas that were like honey-tasted poison, speaking in the name of defending the Palestinian cause. You can Google these writers, academics and politicians and what they have done for peace projects and stopping anti-Semitism. After the terrorist attacks on October 7, 2023 in the streets and mosques of America, Canada, and Europe, they distributed sweets and celebrated the “Al-Aqsa Flood,” a terrorist attack on civilians and innocent Jews in Israel. Is celebrating the killing of Jews not anti-Semitic?
When Israel tried to defend itself from kidnappers, the students of these intellectuals accused Israel of killing innocent people, and when their students killed hundreds of innocent people, raped hundreds, and kidnapped hundreds of others, they remained silent and we did not see the slightest denunciation from them.
In a television interview with the British journalist, Jeremy Corbyn, the former president and spiritual leader of the British Labor Party, was asked 15 times whether Hamas was a terrorist or not. Corbyn has evaded the answer to this question. Here you can understand the reasons for hatred towards Jews under the pretext of opposition to the State of Israel.
Jewish hatred between the lines of the Qur’an and the hadiths of Muhammad:
As for the evidence contained in the authentic hadiths, there are many, so I will discuss this hadith. Al-Bukhari and Muslim narrated in their Sahihs on the authority of Abu Hurairah: that Muhammad said: “The Hour will not come until you fight the Jews, until the stone behind which the Jew says: O Muslim, this is a Jew behind me, so kill him.” “ 1) Tazara / Islam / Al-Isti’ab Magazine / Research on anticipating the future in Palestine through the signs of the Hour, a recent study
In this hadith, Muhammad tells of one of the signs of the Hour, which is the outbreak of war between the Muslims and the Jews. He, peace and blessings be upon him, says: “The Hour will not come until you fight the Jews,” and that is when Jesus, son of Mary, peace be upon him, will descend, and the Muslims will be with him. Jews with the Antichrist. In this war, everyone cooperates with the Muslim mujahideen, to the point that inanimate objects made of stone and the like speak. Whenever a Jew hides behind something, they speak and call out to the Muslim and say: O Muslim, this is a Jew behind me. Aal, kill him. (1)1) Sahih Al-Bukhari and Muslim
In Muslim’s narration: “Except for drowning; For it is one of the trees of the Jews.” And the thorn tree: a type of thorn tree known in the land of Jerusalem, and there the killing of the Antichrist and the Jews will take place. The meaning is: everything, from plants and inanimate objects, cooperates with the Muslim in killing the Jews, except this type. n trees; That’s why the Jews cultivate it a lot. (1) Ibn al-Mulqin said: “What is meant by his saying (‘You fight the Jews’) is that when Jesus descends, the Muslims will be with him, and the Jews will be with the Antichrist,” and this is what a group of commentators on the hadith have confirmed. In fact, Imam al-Tirmidhi (2236) cited the hadith of Abdullah ibn Umar in the chapter “The sign of the antichrist.” Sheikh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah said: The Jews are only waiting for the Antichrist, for he is the one whom the Jews will follow, and seventy thousand of the Jews of Isfahan will go out with him, and the Muslims will kill them with him, until the trees and stones say: O Muslim, this is a Jew behind me, come and kill him. And Sheikh Ibn Baz says: Jesus, peace be upon him, will attack the Antichrist, along with the Muslims, and kill him at the gate of Lydda, a gate in Palestine, near Jerusalem. He will kill him with his spear, as stated in the authentic hadith, and the Muslims with him will kill the Jews with great slaughter. It was mentioned in the hadith on the authority of the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace, that the Muslims fight the Jews, and they kill them. And they dominate them. The trees and stones call out: O Muslim, O Abdullah, this is a Jew. Come and kill him. Then Jesus will kill the Antichrist and his matter will end. Then Sheikh Al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah said: This good news is now with the Jews and Christians. They read it and say: Its owner has not yet appeared, and the distorters of the Torah deleted it in the Book of Daniel, and our Messenger told us that the sect that appears to be on the truth will continue to fight the people of falsehood until the last of them fights the Antichrist. Muhammad said: No. A group of my nation will continue to fight for the truth, and those who differ from them will not harm them, until the Hour comes to them, and they are in that state.” Al-Albani in Sahih Al-Jami’ (7295) to Muslim. (2) The Hour will not come until the Muslims fight the Jews. This hadith may be about seventy years ago, meaning before the rise of this state for these outliers in the horizons. Perhaps a question will arise: How can these people fight, when they are outliers in the horizons and in the worst of the world? (And We divided them into nations in the land) as God Almighty said. They do not have an entity, a large grouping, or a state so that they can be fought. But now that is apparent, as these people have gathered from all parts of the earth in this blessed country, and here he, peace and blessings be upon him, said: “The Hour will not come until the Muslims fight.” Jews,… So the stone and the trees say: O Muslim: “This indicates that there will be great slaughter among them, purifying the land of their filth, such that whoever flees from them will be pursued, and the fighting will not only be for those who were on the battlefield, but rather they will be pursued on every side, even those who are hiding from them.” Pronounced stone and tree. (3)1) Al-Durar Al-Sunniyya – The Hadith Encyclopedia – Explanations of Hadiths (dorar.net)2) Islam Question and Answer / https://islamqa.info/ar/answers3) Saturday / Khaled / https://khaledalsabt.com
The Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, said: “The Antichrist will be followed by seventy thousand of the Jews of Isfahan wearing robes.” Sahih Muslim 2944
It was mentioned in the hadith of Abu Umamah Al-Bahili, who said: The Messenger of God, may God’s prayers and peace be upon him, addressed us and said: “…then God will defeat the Jews, and nothing will remain of what God created for the Jew to hide with except God will speak to that thing, not a stone, nor a tree, nor a wall, nor an animal.” Except for the gharqad, for it is one of their trees. It does not speak except that it says: O Muslim Abdullah, this is a Jew, so come and kill him..))[
The hadith was narrated by Ibn Majah, and its chain of transmission is strong in its wording. Abu Dawud cited his chain of transmission, which is an authentic chain of transmission, to Abu Umamah on the authority of the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace. Then he said: Similar to it, and he mentioned prayers like its meaning, meaning the hadith of Al-Nawwas bin Sam’an, and Ibn Khuzaymah authenticated it, and Al-Hakim narrated it in Al-Mustadrak and said: Sahih. According to Muslim’s condition, Al-Dhahabi approved it, and Al-Hafiz Ibn Hajar cited it in Fath Al-Bari, citing it. According to him, it is an authentic or hasan hadith.
It is written in the Qur’an of Muhammad: O you who have believed, do not take the Jews and Christians as allies of one another. Indeed, Allah does not guide the wrongdoing people [Al-Maeda: 51]
And the Qur’an of Muhammad said regarding the Jews: You will see many of them as allies of those who disbelieve. Miserable is what their souls have presented to them. Indeed, God’s wrath is upon them, and in torment they will abide forever. And if they had believed in God and the Prophet and what was revealed to him, they would not have taken them as friends, but many of them are disobedient. You will certainly find that the most hostile of people is For those who believed, the Jews And those who associate others with others [Al-Ma’idah: 80-82] the verse.
And the Qur’an of Muhammad said: You will not find a people who believe in God and the Last Day being friendly with those who oppose God and His Messenger, even if they are their fathers, sons, or brothers. They or their clan [Al-Mujadila: 22] verse.
The religion with God is Islam, and those who were given the Book did not differ except after knowledge had come to them, out of envy among themselves. And whoever disbelieves in the verses of God, then God He is quick to judge. So if they dispute with you, say, “I have submitted my face to God and to those who follow me.” And say to those who were given the Scripture and the unlettered people, “Have you submitted?” If they submit, They are guided, and if they turn away, your duty is only to convey the message. And God sees His servants [Al Imran: 19-20]
The hadith is authentic. It was narrated by Sheikhs Al-Bukhari and Muslim in Al-Sahihayn and elsewhere, and its wording is: Muslims fight the Jews, and they are victorious over them, until the trees and stones say: O Muslim, O Abdullah, this is a Jew, come and kill him, or something close to this wording.
Mohammad said:
“Convey even a verse on my behalf, and narrate on the authority of the Children of Israel, and there is no blame. Whoever lies about me intentionally, let him take his seat in Hell.” Narrated by Al-Bukhari.
Mohammad said:
“The Children of Israel used to abandon him if the noble among them stole, and if the weak among them stole, they would cut him off.” Narrated by Al-Bukhari
Mohammad said:
“The Hour will not come until the Muslims fight the Jews and the Muslims kill them until the Jew hides behind a stone or a tree and the stone or tree says, ‘O Muslim, O Abdullah, this is a Jew behind me, so come and kill him, except the gharqad, for it is one of the trees of the Jews.’” Narrated by Ahmad.
Mohammad said:
“The world is beautiful and green, and God has appointed you as your successor in it. He will see how you do, so fear the world and fear women, for the first temptation of the Children of Israel was with women.” Narrated by Muslim.
Mohammad said:
“The first time that deficiency came to the Children of Israel was a man meeting another man and saying, ‘O this one, fear God and abandon what you are doing, for it is not permissible for you.’ Then he would meet him the next day, so that would not prevent him from being his eater, drinker, and sitter. When they did that, God struck the hearts of one of them with one another, then said (( Those of the Children of Israel who disbelieved were cursed on the tongue of David and Jesus, son of Mary. That was because they disobeyed and transgressed (78) They did not refrain from an evil. So evil is what they used to do. (79) You will see many of them being friends with those who disbelieve. Evil is what their souls have presented to them, indeed God is displeased with them. And in torment (80) And if they had believed in God and the Prophet and in what was revealed to him, they would not have taken them as allies, but many of them are transgressors (81)) Then he said, “No, by God.” Enjoin what is right and forbid what is wrong, and take the hands of the oppressor, and force him to adhere to the truth strictly, and restrict him to the truth strictly, or let God strike with hearts. Some of you against others, then He will curse you as He cursed them.” Narrated by Abu Dawud
Mohammad said:
“By the One in whose hand is the soul of Muhammad, no one from this nation, Jew or Christian, will hear of me and then die and not believe in what I was sent with, except that he will be among the companions of Hell.” Narrated by Muslim.
Mohammad said:
“If ten Jews followed me, not a Jew would remain on board but would convert to Islam.” Narrated by Muslim
Mohammad said:
“If on the Day of Resurrection, God Almighty will hand over to every Muslim, whether a Jew or a Christian, and say, ‘This is your salvation from Hell.’” Narrated by Muslim.
Mohammad said:
“Hell will be brought, exposed as if it were a mirage, and it will be said to the Jews, ‘What did you worship?’ They will say, ‘We were worshiping Uzair, the son of God.’ It will be said, ‘You lied. God has neither a companion nor a son.’ So what do you want? They said, ‘We want you to give us something to drink.’ It will be said, ‘Drink,’ and they will fall into Hell.” Narrated by Al-Bukhari.
Mohammad said:
“Whatever the People of the Book tell you, do not believe them, and do not disbelieve them, and say, ‘We believe in God and His Messengers.’ If it is false, you will not believe it, but if it is true, you will not disbelieve it.” Narrated by Abu Dawud.
Mohammad said:
“Change gray hair and do not imitate the Jews.” Narrated by Al-Tirmidhi
Mohammad said:
“There are none of us who imitate others. Do not imitate the Jews or the Christians, for the greeting of the Jews is by pointing with the fingers and the greeting of the Christians is by pointing with the palms.” Narrated by Al-Tirmidhi.
Mohammad said:
“Disagree with the Jews, for they do not pray in their sandals or slippers.”
Narrated by Abu Dawood
Mohammad said:
“I lost a nation from among the Children of Israel, and it is not known what she did, and I do not see her as anything but a mouse. If camel milk was given to her, she would not drink, and if sheep’s milk was given to her, she would drink.” Narrated by Al-Bukhari.
Mohammad said:
“…And Hell was presented to me, and I saw in it a woman from the Children of Israel being tortured over a cat of hers that she had tied up but did not feed it and did not let it eat from the vermin of the earth.” Narrated by Muslim.
Fatwa….
Sheikh Muhammad bin Saleh Al-Uthaymeen said in his book *Riyadh Al-Saliheen* regarding the signs of the Hour he mentioned:
What he narrated on the authority of Abu Hurairah, may God be pleased with him: “The Hour will not come until the Muslims and the Jews fight”: The Muslims after the mission of the Messenger, may God bless him and grant him peace, are the followers of the Messenger Muhammad, may God bless him and his family and grant them peace, and before that, the Muslim was the one who followed the existing Sharia, so the people of Moses in During the era of Moses, they were Muslims, and the Christians during the era of Jesus were Muslims, and whoever of Noah’s people believed were Muslims, and likewise everyone who believed in a Messenger whose message was established is a Muslim, but after the mission of the Messenger, peace and blessings be upon him, he is not a Muslim except the one who believes in him, in the Messenger, peace and blessings be upon him, otherwise he should not hide from you. That the disciples said: We are supporters of God, and that the Queen of Sheba said: {I have wronged myself and submitted with Solomon to God, Lord of the worlds} and other things that are known.
The Jews are the followers of Moses. They were named after their grandfather, Judah. They are related to this grandfather, but with Arabization they became Jews with the signifier, which is: “a nation of wrath, cursed, treacherous, traitorous, deceitful, describing their Lord with fault and deficiency. The Jews said: {The hand of God is tied}, and they said: The God is poor, and they said: God was tired when He created the heavens and the earth, so He rested on the Sabbath, and other things that they described God Almighty with as shortcomings and defects.
As for the messengers, it happened, and there is nothing wrong with them, that they disbelieved in the messengers and killed them unjustly, and they killed the Messiah, Jesus, son of Mary, with their claim: {And they killed him, nor did they crucify him}: they are the most vile nation among the nations, the Jews, and they are a traitorous, treacherous people who do not fulfill their covenant or obligation, and are not entrusted with anything.
Before the Day of Resurrection, they will fight the Muslims. Consider the word: Muslims. Consider the word Muslims!! Muslims and Jews fight, and the Muslims give them a mighty victory, to the point that the Jew hides with stones and trees, meaning he hides himself with them, and with trees, so the trees and stone say: – God who makes all things speak to him – O Muslim, this is a Jew under me, so kill him. Stones and trees speak, why? Because the fight is between the Muslims and the Jews, but between the Arabs and the Jews, God knows who will be victorious, because the one who fights the Jews for the sake of Arabism has fought out of fanaticism and fanaticism, not for God Almighty, and he cannot be victorious as long as he fights for the sake of Arabism, not for the sake of religion and Islam. Unless God wills.
But if we fight them – that is, the Jews – for the sake of Islam, and we are true to Islam, then we will prevail, God willing. Even the trees and stones speak in favor of us and against the Jews. Even the stones say: This is a Jew, so kill him, and the trees say: This is a Jew, so kill him. But as long as the issue is fanaticism, Arabism, and the like. There is never a guarantee of victory.
That is why it is not possible for the Arabs to stand on this basis, that is: the basis of Arabism, and the evidence for this reality is, “And they ground and baked on it and for it, and it did not benefit anything. On the contrary, the great calamities from the Jews on the Arabs became something great.” They occupied their homes, besieged them, and harmed them, but if The Jews were fighting for the sake of Islam and in the name of the Muslims, but due to the ignorance of the Arabs, they began fighting the Jews for the sake of Arabism, and therefore they have not been victorious over them until now.
Victory over the Jews is a reality in Islam and nothing else, and the Hour will not come until what the truthful and trustworthy Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, told him. The Muslims fight the Jews, and the Muslims kill them and defeat them and appear over them, and the stones and trees that are not accustomed to uttering will call out: O Muslim, this is a Jew. So kill him.
Likewise, one of the signs of the Hour, which must be: that the Euphrates, which is the well-known river in the far east of the peninsula, will lose gold, a mountain of gold, or a treasure of gold. It will be sad, meaning: gold will bring forth a mountain, and gold is known:
“I saw people going to someone who had gold.”
Gold steals minds. Everyone wants gold. This water will erase the flowing river from a mountain of gold. Glory be to God!! A mountain of gold and pebbles, what? From gold, the Messenger, peace and blessings be upon him, says, gold comes out, and then it recedes.
Everyone says: “Perhaps I am the one who will be saved”: Perhaps I will be the one who will be saved, fighting to reach the gold.
Petroleum and they began to call it black gold. God knows best what the Messenger of God intended, but until now we do not know gold except this well-known yellow metal, so we remain as it is.
There are days behind us, and the world has not yet ended for us to say: We must apply the hadith to reality. If the world had ended, we would have said: Yes, the Messenger of God spoke the truth, and what is meant by gold is petroleum because it is sold for gold, but as long as the issue remains as long as the world is over, we are waiting for what the truthful and trustworthy person told him. It is bound to happen and people will fight over it, and this is one of the signs of the Hour, but it has not come yet, and God is the Grantor of success.
https://al-fatawa.com/fatwa/71665
These are some documents among thousands of Qur’anic texts and modern Islamic texts, indicating the killing and hatred of Jews. Muslim children on their first days of school study these texts, and it is mandatory that they must memorize all the lines. This is how they brainwash their societies and prepare them for a holy war.
Today, there is no need to collect thousands of books on Islam to understand this religion and its position on Jews, other religions, and other civilizations. Just search in the Quran (Arabic) for (jihad, killing, infidels, war in the Quran and sayings of Muhammad). This is enough to know the satanic terrorist ideology! According to the verses of the Qur’an and Islamic law, it is impossible for Islam to accept (coexistence, tolerance, and acceptance of others). Any Muslim who claims to be fighting for democracy, humanity, coexistence, and justice, this Muslim has not read the Qur’an or Islamic law. Perhaps he has read, but he wants to deceive you and lie to you. No Muslim erases any of the verses of the Qur’an in order to believe in coexistence and acceptance of others. In Surah Al-Ma’idah, verse (51) in the Qur’an, it says:
“O you who have believed, do not take the Jews and Christians as allies. Some of them are allies of others. And whoever of you befriends them is indeed one of them. Indeed, God does not guide the unjust people.
So my writing ended with this line: If Al-Qaeda, ISIS, Hezbollah, the Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas and the Islamic Republic of Iran end, terrorism does not end because the Qur’an is the holy book for every terrorist to create the terrorist group. That is why they hate everyone other than their own religion and culture, and that is why they hate Jews under the guise of opposition to the State of Israel.
Sources:
Books:
The Holocaust by Martin Gilbert
Anti-Semitism: A History and Psychoanalysis of Contemporary Hatred by Avner Falk
Anti-Judaism: The Western Tradition by David Nirenberg
The War Against the Jews, 1933-1945 by Lucy S. Dawidowicz
A Convenient Hatred: The History of Anti-Semitism by Phyllis Goldstein
The Origins of Totalitarianism by Hannah Arendt (includes a section on anti-Semitism)
The Devil That Never Dies: The Rise and Threat of Global Anti-Semitism by Daniel Jonah Goldhagen – This book examines the history and resurgence of anti-Semitism on a global scale.
Antisemitism: Here and Now by Deborah E. Lipstadt – Lipstadt provides a contemporary analysis of anti-Semitism, exploring its manifestations and addressing the current challenges.
Anti-Judaism: The Western Tradition by David Nirenberg – Nirenberg delves into the history of anti-Jewish sentiment in the Western world, exploring its cultural and intellectual roots.
Denying the Holocaust: The Growing Assault on Truth and Memory by Deborah E. Lipstadt – Lipstadt confronts Holocaust denial and the ways in which historical truths are challenged.
The War Against the Jews, 1933-1945 by Lucy S. Dawidowicz – This comprehensive work provides an historical account of the war against the Jews during the Nazi era.
History on Trial: My Day in Court with a Holocaust Denier by Deborah E. Lipstadt – Lipstadt recounts her legal battle against Holocaust denier David Irving and reflects on the broader implications of confronting denial.
Anti-Semitism: A Very Short Introduction by Steven Beller – A concise overview of the history and manifestations of anti-Semitism.
Jews and Anti-Judaism in the New Testament: Decision Points and Divergent Interpretations by Terence L. Donaldson – Focuses on the historical roots of anti-Judaism in the New Testament.
A Convenient Hatred: The History of Antisemitism by Phyllis Goldstein – Tracing the history of anti-Semitism from ancient times to the present day, this book explores its enduring patterns.
Antisemitism: A Historical Encyclopedia of Prejudice and Persecution edited by Richard S. Levy – An extensive reference work that covers the history and cultural impact of anti-Semitism.
Research Studies and Articles:
. Contemporary Global Anti-Semitism: A Report Provided to the United States Congress” – A report by the U.S. Department of State.
. Antisemitism in the Contemporary World” – A report by the Anti-Defamation League (ADL).
. Understanding and Combating Hate: Anti-Semitism” – A research paper by the Center on Extremism at the George Washington University.
Online Resources:
The Vidal Sassoon International Center for the Study of Antisemitism (SICSA): Conducts research and publishes studies on anti-Semitism. SICSA
The Anti-Defamation League (ADL): Provides reports, research, and educational resources on anti-Semitism. ADL
Documentary:
Defamation (השמצה) – A documentary by Israeli filmmaker Yoav Shamir that explores perceptions of anti-Semitism.
Academic Journals:
. Journal for the Study of Antisemitism
Patterns of Prejudice – Publishes articles on various forms of prejudice, including anti-Semitism.
. Contemporary Jewry – An academic journal that covers various aspects of Jewish life, including anti-Semitism.
Holocaust and Genocide Studies – Focuses on the historical aspects of anti-Semitism, including the Holocaust.
Educational Resources:
. Facing History and Ourselves: Provides educational resources on anti-Semitism and prejudice. https://www.facinghistory.org
. Yad Vashem: The World Holocaust Remembrance Center offers educational materials and resources on the Holocaust and anti-Semitism. https://www.yadvashem.org
Documentaries:
Never Forget to Lie – A documentary that explores the experiences of child survivors of the Holocaust and how they dealt with their past.
Reports and Articles:
. Global Anti-Semitism: Selected Incidents and Statistics” – A report by the Kantor Center for the Study of Contemporary European Jewry. https://kantorcenter.tau.ac.il/sites/humanities.tau.ac.il/files/media_server/About/Global_Antisemitism_Report_2019_Final.pdf
. Anti-Semitism: Why Does It Exist? And Why Does it Persist?” – An article in The Jerusalem Post by Dina Porat. https://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Anti-Semitism-Why-does-it-exist-and-why-does-it-persist-593717
Organizations:
. Simon Wiesenthal Center: A global human rights organization that confronts anti-Semitism and educates against hate. https://www.wiesenthal.com
. The American Jewish Committee (AJC): Works to combat anti-Semitism and protect the rights of Jews worldwide. https://www.ajc.org
*the first Former Head of Jewish Affairs in Kurdistan Regional Government – Iraq.
Sherzad Mamsani (left on the picture)